Fig 1: Portions of the frames for I, P, Polarized Flux and the Flat Field:
pixels [250:420,300:470] in the original image. North is 154deg ccw. Since
these have not been demodulated or rotated as were the Capetti et al. figures,
individual pixels are not smoothed out. The bump in the flat field at about
x = 225, y = 215, is the unreliable flat field area indicated by Cappetti et al.
Cloud D lies on top of or at the edge of a bump in the flat field, located at
about x = 250, y = 240. The bump in the flat field at about x = 290, y = 300,
is the area indicated in the text on the opposite side of Cloud B from the
unreliable flat field area of Capetti et al. There is a slight bump in the
flat field at about x = 275, y = 250, which corresponds to a small area of
high polarization on our plots and those of Capetti et al.
Fig 2: For comparision: Capetti et al. (ApJ 446,155) Figure 6, Total
Intensity Map; Figure 7, Polarized Flux; and Figure 8, Degree of Polarization
oriented to be the same as our Fig 1.
Fig 3: Cloud Identification: Evans et al (ApJ 369, L28) Figures 1 and 2.
Scale: I black = 0, white = 2500
Polarized Flux black = 0, white = 200
P black = 25%, white = 0
Flat Field black = 1.50, white = 1.0
Fig 2 & 3 are not shown here: see the original papers: